14 comments

• 

  huricano

  9 months ago

  Normally I very much and agree with your (majorleaguesoccertalk.com) pieces, but this one is daft. Why change the rules? The first seasons of MLS proved that such a move provides no benefits. What soccer in the US needs is more youth development, more league development (maybe tweaks to the current MLS format to make it relevant all summer long, as you have mentioned other days. my vote is for the Brasil model, only shorter), more youth development, and creative players that shine on a world stage. Changing soccer will not help it.
  reply
• 

  Cavan

  9 months ago

  Those other leagues have had the same rules for the century of their existence. They have only changed the rules within the context of maintaining fairness during play. The only rule I can think of that was changed for viewership was the adopting of the 3point line from the ABA. Those other leagues have had a century to build a fanbase. It's not fair to directly compare them. It will take a while for the older generations who didn't grow up with the game to be supplanted by generations who, if they didn't play, at least had friends who did and are familiar with it.
  reply
• 

  undrafted

  9 months ago

  First off I'm not sure what changes you propose.
  
  Secondly, FIFA will allow very limited changes. Back in the beginning, MLS discussed using bigger nets. IIRC, FIFA said no. The game is fairly standardized in every country across the world. FIFA sees to that and has the threat of World Cup banishment for anyone who dares oppose them.
  
  The mild tinkering allowed would probably only serve to drive away "hardcore" fans. MLS already tried a shootout (PKs with a running start), a backwards clock, no stoppage time, etc. I don't think any helped.
  reply
• 

  Lee

  9 months ago

  Huh? You said that the US must change its soccer rules abot 12 times in your piece, but didn't offer even one suggestion.
  Why did you waste your time and ours?
  
  And frankly, I don't agree with your premise in the first place, I feel it has taken so long for soccer to catch on here in the US exactly because up until the very recent timeframe soccer did nothing but pander to people who barely gave two farts about the game.
  reply
• 

  LV

  9 months ago

  Man you've deviated from your past posts. In the past you constantly said American sports were silly for their complex rules and complained that the games are inconsistent. Now you want Football to change.
  
  You are a total hypocrite.
  reply
• 

  Jeff

  9 months ago

  What irony. After repeatedly ripping American sports as stupid and the rules as a way to manipulate results you turn around and write a piece saying the rules of football should change? Didn't you say a few months ago the beauty of the game was that it was so simple. Perhaps I should stop reading this site if you've allowed the pressure from the American sports lobby to get to you.
  reply
• 

  The Gaffer

  9 months ago

  Gentlemen,
  
  I just want to step in to let you know that Kartik Krishnaiyer didn't write the article. Mitch Howard did, so if you have any criticism or praise, please direct it at Mitch not Kartik for this particular post.
  
  Cheers,
  The Gaffer
  reply
• 

  huricano

  9 months ago

  Who is Mitch Howard? Will he be allowed to post again?
  reply
• 

  Tyler

  9 months ago

  It's not the game that needs changing, it's the coverage. You can't generalize American sports fans by saying they need more excitement in their games and that they need to be more fast paced. You only need to look to the fact that baseball and american football are the two most popular sports. Both sports are pretty slow paced, with all the stopping and starting, but yet Americans eat them up. What soccer needs is better coverage on television and in the media. If Sports Center had highlights of MLS games, Champions League games, and key European club match ups presented by their regular hosts (in a non-condescending fashion) we'd be in business. They could edit out all the "boring" stuff and only show the exciting parts and people might get hooked. Also, how about some European soccer in HD! People will watch anything if it's in HD! I can watch poker in HD on ESPN, but not the Champions leauge? Come on!
  reply
• 

  Glenn Csonka

  9 months ago

  What the MLS needs to do is win consistently. Now that the CONCACAF Champion's League has become a reality, a 4-0 drubbing at home by Joe Public over New England doesn't do anything to support the sport in the U.S..
  
  While the other major sports in the U.S. boasts the world's best players, MLS (or any league in Europe for that matter) can make that claim. It's important however to try to hold on to good players in MLS, rather than creating a perception that MLS is a developmental league for the rest of the world..
  reply
• 

  jhholda

  9 months ago

  Didn't they try that with the NASL? And we all know where that ended up.....just saying....
  reply
• 

  kofi_x5

  9 months ago

  The spark needed to provide that excitement for spectators and the delicious carrot to lure in the best of our youth athletes is money. Serious money. Multi mill contracts straight out of the development leagues and colleges.
  Changing the rules of Football makes no sense. And would further lessen the respect we've barely achieved over the last decade or so. What gives us the right...From where does our audacity flow that we should think we know enough about the beautiful game that we could 'improve' it by adding rules? We already have a game that's all about rules--its called American Football. Thats the game with so many rules the commentators job is to explain the rules of the game throughout its 3 hour duration.
  
  Improve and develop our style of football in this country by letting our players play and paying our best very well when they deserve it. From this will come incentive, and inspiration and excitement. This will take time.
  
  Basketball in the US has been around for 100+ years and American Football for about 80. They are our games and they've had time to blossom into something amazing on their own. I've seen some old BBall games from the the 60's and 70's. Yuck! Please...they were soooo slow and boring. No tricks, no jams, no dunks, no 3's for petes sake! Look what we have now! Incredible. PointyBall was more like rugby when it started out. Who knows how or why they chose the name Football when they could've called it Cricket or Tennis. I'm getting away from my point here. When 'football' started there was no forward pass. The concept of the forward pass came about after something like 20 years.
  These elements add excitement to these games but they are our games. However, Football, the Beautiful Game, the World Game,is not for us to alter. But maybe one day, in my lifetime, the world will want to play the game the way the US plays.
  reply
• 

  Jonathan

  9 months ago

  "Americanize" soccer and the potential viewers of MLS will be more inclined to not watch. Note that it is easy to watch FSC , GolTv, and ESPN Deportes. They are direct competitors that give the viewers a higher quality product.
  
  The fans of foreign leagues are the ones that MLS should view as their potential viewers. Converting other sports fans would be harder. Of course MLS TRIES so hard to alienate those with knowledge of the game (see CONCSCAF CL games).
  reply
• 

  Terry

  8 months ago

  It won't work. The reason Americans have not taken to football (the real football!) with the same passion as other nations is that they are not the best in the world at it.
  
  Their NBA is the undisputed no. 1 of its kind, their NHL is also the elite tournament (even if Canadians are actually the best at it!), there is only one NFL so obviously it is the best and their baseball was a "World Series" even when there were nothing but American teams in it. Get the pattern here?
  
  If their football League was recognised by all as the best on earth, they would not only attract the best players, but the fans would flock to it. Why do you think Pele, Cruyff, Beckenbauer, Moore, Muller, Best, Eusebio and countless others went to the US of A in the '70's? It was to give star quality to the young NASL. Much the same with Beckham today.
  
  Now if they could only do it while the greats of the game are at their peak instead of retired from internationals, they would be on to something.
  reply