<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Major League Soccer Talk - Latest Comments in What Would An MLS Single Table Have Looked Like in Historic Terms</title><link>http://majorleaguesoccertalk.disqus.com/</link><description>MLS News &amp; Analysis</description><atom:link href="https://majorleaguesoccertalk.disqus.com/what_would_an_mls_single_table_have_looked_like_in_historic_terms/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 01:41:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: What Would An MLS Single Table Have Looked Like in Historic Terms</title><link>http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com/what-would-an-mls-single-table-have-looked-like-in-historic-terms/128#comment-1784029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the only problem with your numbers is that mls doesn't play a balanced schedule.  i did a spreadsheet a year or so ago (wish i could remember what i did with it) that had games against the other conference counting double--each teams plays their own conference 4x and the other conference 2x--and the results were even more different.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric PZ</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 01:41:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>